⚠ PUBLIC RECORD — DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPTS — CASE 2:26-cv-02813-MEF-MAH
SOTO v. DENNEHEY
Deposition Transcripts — Public Record
← Back to Case Overview
Sworn Testimony — Public Record
Deposition Transcripts

The following deposition transcripts have been filed with the court and are part of the public record. Both depositions feature Reverend Rodney Haveman — named in the federal complaint as an enterprise coordinator who organized secret meetings, filed false police reports, and participated in the coordinated scheme to remove Pastor Steven Soto. Howard B. Mankoff, Esq. of Marshall Dennehey appeared as counsel in both proceedings.

Deposition 01 — Filed Jan 23, 2026
Deposition of Reverend Rodney Haveman
Case SWC-F-004225-24 — 340 Bogert Funding LLC v. River Edge Church et al.
Case
SWC-F-004225-24
Court
Superior Court of NJ
Chancery Division: Bergen County
Date Taken
January 6, 2026
Location
Marshall Dennehey, P.C.
425 Eagle Rock Ave, Roseland, NJ
Witness
Rev. Rodney Haveman
MD Counsel
Howard B. Mankoff, Esq.
Marshall Dennehey
Pages
171 pages
Reporter
Mary Ann Adams, CCR

This deposition was taken in the manufactured foreclosure case (SWC-F-004225-24) — the case in which Marshall Dennehey's Howard Mankoff continues to falsely claim that his "clients" own Pastor Soto's church building, despite prior litigation on the same claims being dismissed with prejudice. The deposition was conducted at Marshall Dennehey's own offices in Roseland, NJ, where Mankoff appeared as defense counsel for the Reformed Church of Cherry Hill and New Bridge. The plaintiff in this case — 340 Bogert Funding LLC — is controlled by defendant Daniel J. Houlihan Jr.

Notable: Location of Deposition
The deposition of Rodney Haveman was conducted at the offices of Marshall Dennehey, P.C., 425 Eagle Rock Avenue, Roseland, New Jersey — the same firm named as a defendant in the federal civil rights complaint for coordinating the alleged enterprise.
⬇ Download Transcript (PDF)
Deposition 02 — January 10, 2022
Deposition of Rodney Haveman
Case BER-C-153-20 — Reformed Church of Cherry Hill v. Steven Soto
Case
BER-C-153-20
Court
Superior Court of NJ
General Equity Part: Bergen County
Date Taken
January 10, 2022
Format
Remote (Veritext Virtual)
Witness
Rodney Haveman
541 4th Ave, Westwood, NJ
MD Counsel
Howard B. Mankoff, Esq.
Justin Johnson, Esq.
Marshall Dennehey
Soto Counsel
Crew Schielke, Esq.
Reporter
Pamela Adamo, CSR

This deposition was taken in BER-C-153-20 — the malicious prosecution case that was ultimately dismissed with prejudice in Soto's favor. Both Howard Mankoff and Justin Johnson of Marshall Dennehey appeared as counsel for the plaintiff and witness. The case was the first wave of litigation against Soto. Despite the dismissal with prejudice, defendants continued litigation on the same underlying claims — conduct the federal complaint characterizes as intentional fraud on the court.

Key Testimony — Haveman's Own Words
When asked what the lawsuit was trying to accomplish, Haveman stated:

"Our primary effort is to get Steven Soto out of the house that we own."

This testimony was given under oath in a case that was later dismissed with prejudice. Defendants subsequently continued to litigate the same claims through additional cases.
⬇ Download Transcript (PDF)

DISCLAIMER: All information provided is based on public records filed in U.S. District Court Case No. 2:26-cv-02813. This campaign is for public information and transparency purposes only and is not a threat of any kind.